The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Assessment of Alternative Mating Strategies in Anopheles gambiae: Does Mating Occur Indoors?
Open accessAbstract
Mating in Anopheles gambiae has been observed only in outdoor swarms. Here we evaluate whether mating also occurs indoors. Mark-release-recapture of virgin males and females in natural houses showed that mating occurred over a single day even when mosquitoes can leave the house through exit traps and without adaptation to laboratory conditions. In these experiments, insemination rate in the M molecular form of An. gambiae (and An. arabiensis) was higher than that of the S form (15 versus 6%). Under these conditions, smaller females of the M form mated more frequently than larger females of that form. Sampling mosquitoes throughout the day showed that both sexes enter houses around sunrise and leave around sunset, staying indoors together from dawn to dusk. In an area dominated by the M form, the daily rate of insemination in samples from exit traps was approximately 5% higher than in those from entry traps, implying that mating occurred indoors. Importantly, frequency of cross mating between the molecular forms was as high as that between members of the same form, indicating that, indoors, assortative mating breaks down. Altogether, these results suggest that indoor mating is an alternative mating strategy of the M molecular form of An. gambiae. Because naturally occurring mating couples have not yet been observed indoors, this conclusion awaits validation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Importantly, cross mating between the molecular forms occurred indoors as much as mating between members of the same form (Dao et al., 2008), indicating that chemical cues such as pheromones and cuticular hydrocarbons do not play a major role in form recognition, unless such signals are only released or perceived during swarming.”
From The molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae: a phenotypic perspective (2008) · cites this paper as Dao et al., 2008
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 40
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- Cambounac, 1940, Am. J. Trop. Med., 20, 133
- Charlwood, 1980, Physiol. Entomol., 5, 315
- Charlwood, 2002a, Med. Vet. Entomol., 16, 109
- Charlwood, 2002b, J. Vector Ecol., 27, 178
- Coluzzi, 1979, Trans.R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., 73, 483
- Coluzzi, 1985, Boll. Zool., 52, 45
- della Torre, 2001, Insect Mol. Biol., 10, 9
- della Torre, 2005, Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol., 35, 755
- Diabate, 2003, Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., 97, 713
- Diabate, 2006, J. Med. Entomol., 43, 480
- Dolo, 2004, Acta Trop., 89, 147
- Downes, 1969, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 14, 271
- Edillo, 2002, J. Med. Entomol., 39, 70
- Emlen, 1977, Science, 197, 215
- Fanello, 2002, Med. Vet. Entomol., 16, 461
- Favia, 2001, Insect Mol. Biol., 10, 19
- Gentile, 2001, s. Insect Mol. Biol., 10, 25
- Gwadz, 1971, J. Am. Mosq. Contr. Assoc., 14, 210
- Hartberg, 1971, Bull. WHO, 45, 847
- Hunt, 1998, Trans.R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., 92, 231
- Lanzaro, 1998, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 95, 14260
- Lehmann, 2003, J. Hered., 94, 133
- Lounibos, 1998, J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc., 14, 210
- Marchand, 1984, Neth. J. Zool., 34, 367
- McIver, 1980, Bull. Entomol. Res., 70, 11
- McLachlan, 1989, Ecol. Entomol., 14, 85
- Mukabayire, 2001, Insect Mol. Biol., 10, 33
- Nielsen, 1960, Misc. Publ. Entomol., 1, 79
- Okanda, 2002, Malar. J., 1, 10
- Toure, 1998, Parassitologia, 40, 477
- Tripet, 2001, Mol. Ecol., 10, 1725
- Tripet, 2004, J. Med. Entomol., 41, 1572
- Turner, 2005, PLoS Biol., 3, e285
- Yawson, 2007, Genetics, 175, 751
- Yuval, 2006, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 51, 413
- Yuval, 1994, Bull. Entomol. Res., 84, 137
- Yuval, 1992, Proc. Calif. Mosq. Vector Control Assoc., 60, 76
- Yuval, 1993, J. Insect Behav., 6, 333
Metadata
- Authors
- Dao, A., Adamou, A., Yaro, A. S., Maïga, H. M., Kassogue, Y., Traoré, S. F., & Lehmann, T.
- Affiliations
- Malaria Research and Training Center (ML)
- University of Bamako (ML)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Entomology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-07-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 643-652
- ISSN
- 0022-2585 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4789130
- OpenAlex
- W2178545296
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Entomology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (Z99 AI999999)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (ZIAAI001196)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
- Keywords
- Anopheles gambiae, Anopheles arabiensis, alternative mating tactics, assortative mating, crossbreeding, insemination rate, mark-release-recapture
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Anopheles, Female, Housing, Animal, Male, Mosquito Control, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Ecosystem
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review