Cited by 40Malaria Research and ControlAnimal Behavior and ReproductionMosquito-borne diseases and control

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Assessment of Alternative Mating Strategies in Anopheles gambiae: Does Mating Occur Indoors?

Open access
Dao, Adama, Adamou, Abdoulaye, Yaro, Alpha Seydou, Maïga, Hamidou Moussa, Kassogue, Yaya, Traoré, Sékou Fantamady, Lehmann, Tovi·2008·Journal of Medical Entomology

Abstract

Mating in Anopheles gambiae has been observed only in outdoor swarms. Here we evaluate whether mating also occurs indoors. Mark-release-recapture of virgin males and females in natural houses showed that mating occurred over a single day even when mosquitoes can leave the house through exit traps and without adaptation to laboratory conditions. In these experiments, insemination rate in the M molecular form of An. gambiae (and An. arabiensis) was higher than that of the S form (15 versus 6%). Under these conditions, smaller females of the M form mated more frequently than larger females of that form. Sampling mosquitoes throughout the day showed that both sexes enter houses around sunrise and leave around sunset, staying indoors together from dawn to dusk. In an area dominated by the M form, the daily rate of insemination in samples from exit traps was approximately 5% higher than in those from entry traps, implying that mating occurred indoors. Importantly, frequency of cross mating between the molecular forms was as high as that between members of the same form, indicating that, indoors, assortative mating breaks down. Altogether, these results suggest that indoor mating is an alternative mating strategy of the M molecular form of An. gambiae. Because naturally occurring mating couples have not yet been observed indoors, this conclusion awaits validation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1603/0022-2585(2008)45[643:aoamsi]2.0.co;2

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 40

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Cambounac, 1940, Am. J. Trop. Med., 20, 133
  2. Charlwood, 1980, Physiol. Entomol., 5, 315
  3. Charlwood, 2002a, Med. Vet. Entomol., 16, 109
  4. Charlwood, 2002b, J. Vector Ecol., 27, 178
  5. Coluzzi, 1979, Trans.R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., 73, 483
  6. Coluzzi, 1985, Boll. Zool., 52, 45
  7. della Torre, 2001, Insect Mol. Biol., 10, 9
  8. della Torre, 2005, Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol., 35, 755
  9. Diabate, 2003, Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., 97, 713
  10. Diabate, 2006, J. Med. Entomol., 43, 480
  11. Dolo, 2004, Acta Trop., 89, 147
  12. Downes, 1969, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 14, 271
  13. Edillo, 2002, J. Med. Entomol., 39, 70
  14. Emlen, 1977, Science, 197, 215
  15. Fanello, 2002, Med. Vet. Entomol., 16, 461
  16. Favia, 2001, Insect Mol. Biol., 10, 19
  17. Gentile, 2001, s. Insect Mol. Biol., 10, 25
  18. Gwadz, 1971, J. Am. Mosq. Contr. Assoc., 14, 210
  19. Hartberg, 1971, Bull. WHO, 45, 847
  20. Hunt, 1998, Trans.R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., 92, 231
  21. Lanzaro, 1998, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 95, 14260
  22. Lehmann, 2003, J. Hered., 94, 133
  23. Lounibos, 1998, J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc., 14, 210
  24. Marchand, 1984, Neth. J. Zool., 34, 367
  25. McIver, 1980, Bull. Entomol. Res., 70, 11
  26. McLachlan, 1989, Ecol. Entomol., 14, 85
  27. Mukabayire, 2001, Insect Mol. Biol., 10, 33
  28. Nielsen, 1960, Misc. Publ. Entomol., 1, 79
  29. Okanda, 2002, Malar. J., 1, 10
  30. Toure, 1998, Parassitologia, 40, 477
  31. Tripet, 2001, Mol. Ecol., 10, 1725
  32. Tripet, 2004, J. Med. Entomol., 41, 1572
  33. Turner, 2005, PLoS Biol., 3, e285
  34. Yawson, 2007, Genetics, 175, 751
  35. Yuval, 2006, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 51, 413
  36. Yuval, 1994, Bull. Entomol. Res., 84, 137
  37. Yuval, 1992, Proc. Calif. Mosq. Vector Control Assoc., 60, 76
  38. Yuval, 1993, J. Insect Behav., 6, 333

Metadata

Authors
Dao, A., Adamou, A., Yaro, A. S., Maïga, H. M., Kassogue, Y., Traoré, S. F., & Lehmann, T.
Affiliations
  • Malaria Research and Training Center (ML)
  • University of Bamako (ML)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Journal of Medical Entomology
Published
2008-07-01
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
643-652
ISSN
0022-2585 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2178545296
Cited by
40
References
39
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Entomology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (Z99 AI999999)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (ZIAAI001196)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
Keywords
Anopheles gambiae, Anopheles arabiensis, alternative mating tactics, assortative mating, crossbreeding, insemination rate, mark-release-recapture
MeSH terms
Animals, Anopheles, Female, Housing, Animal, Male, Mosquito Control, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review